Publications
Request to answer a question. Appeal dismissed, as DCHA was not obligated to answer questions, and because requests must reasonably describe a record.
Request for application and hiring materials. Appeal was dismissed after MPD provided additional documents; MPD was not obligated to create additional records.
Request for records relating to three investigations. OHR’s decision was affirmed, because OHR provided responsive documents.
Request for records related to contract with website. MPD’s decision was affirmed, because MPD and DMV are separate agencies and MPD was not obligated to transfer requester’s request.
Request for grant agreement. DMPED’s decision was affirmed because the redacted information involved commercial information, the release of which could cause substantial harm.
Request for evaluations and analysis pertaining to an address. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from DCRA and DCRA provided requester with a response.
Request for registered agent corporate filing. EOM’s decision affirmed because it conducted an adequate search and EOM did not possess the requested records.
Request for records regarding lead testing of water. Appeal dismissed as moot because it was a new request, that DC Water represented it would address.
Request for investigatory records of communications between a homicide victim and Wikileaks. MPD’s decision was affirmed, because release of any responsive investigatory records would interfere with an enforcement proceeding.
Request to answer a question. Appeal dismissed, as DCRA was not obligated to answer questions, and because requests must reasonably describe a record.