Publications
Request for records related to a neighborhood cat program. DOH’s denial was remanded, because the records could be disclosed with reasonable redactions to protect personal privacy interests.
Request for records related to a criminal investigation. MPD’s denial was affirmed because disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
Request for records related to lost or stolen firearms. MPD’s denial was remanded because the records could be disclosed with reasonable redactions to protect personal privacy interests.
Request for records related to the Hearst Park & Pool Project. OCFO’s denial claiming the request was overly burdensome was remanded to conduct a search and disclose nonexempt responsive documents on a rolling basis.
Request for all records between two agencies related to the requester. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because DOES provided additional records after the appeal was filed.
Request for records related to a debt on a credit report. EOM’s response was affirmed on the basis that it conducted an adequate search and no responsive records were found. EOM noted the agency that would likely maintain responsive records.
Request for records related to the Hearst Park & Pool Project. The requester provided evidence that DGS’s response was missing information. DGS’s response was remanded to conduct another search and disclose nonexempt responsive documents on a rolling basis.
Request for records related to the Hearst Park & Pool Project. In response to the appeal, DGS acknowledged that additional responsive records were located by subsequent searched. DGS’s response was remanded to disclose nonexempt responsive documents on a rolling basis.
Request for records related to the investigation of an alleged sexual assault. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because MPD responded to the request after the appeal was submitted follow the conclusion of enforcement proceedings.
Request for records related to eight police reports. MPD’s search was affirmed as adequate. The appeal did not appear to challenge MPD’s application of FOIA exemptions.