Washington, DC
Publications
Request to answer a question. Appeal dismissed, as EOM was not obligated to answer questions, and because requests must reasonably describe a record.
Request for payment standards information regarding an MLS advertisement. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from DCRA and DCRA provided requester with a response.
Request for emails with a set of search terms. Appeal remanded to DOEE, because the agency had no adequately shown redacted emails were protected by the deliberative process privilege.
Request for application and hiring materials. Appeal was dismissed after MPD provided additional documents; MPD was not obligated to create additional records.
Request to answer a question. Appeal dismissed, as DCHA was not obligated to answer questions, and because requests must reasonably describe a record.
Request for records relating to three investigations. OHR’s decision was affirmed, because OHR provided responsive documents.
Request for records related to an investigation of an officer involved in a shooting that occurred on September 11, 2016. MPD’s decision was affirmed on the basis of personal privacy interests.
Request for two emails related to Hearst Park. DGS’s response was affirmed, because the redacted portions were draft language that would have revealed the deliberative process.
Request for records relating to MPD trips or activities located in foreign countries. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because MPD was in the process of responding.
Request for records pertaining to a contract with Human Rescue Alliance. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from OCP and OCP provided requester with a response.
Pages
