Washington, DC
Publications
Request to answer a question. Appeal dismissed, as DCHA was not obligated to answer questions, and because requests must reasonably describe a record.
Request for records relating to three investigations. OHR’s decision was affirmed, because OHR provided responsive documents.
Request for records related to two addresses. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from DCRA and DCRA provided requester with a response.
Request for records relating to Hearst Park. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from DDOT and DDOT provided requester with a response.
Request for record related to a contract. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from DHS and DHS provided requester with a response.
Request for registered agent corporate filing. EOM’s decision affirmed because it conducted an adequate search and EOM did not possess the requested records.
Request for records relating to MPD trips or activities located in foreign countries. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because MPD was in the process of responding.
Request for records pertaining to a contract with Human Rescue Alliance. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from OCP and OCP provided requester with a response.
Request for medical records. DOH’s decision was affirmed because DOH conducted an adequate search.
Request for records relating to a property. Appeal remanded to DCRA to conduct an adequate search.
Pages
