Washington, DC
Publications
Request for records related to allegations of cronyism and nepotism. OIG’s response was affirmed on the basis that it conducted an adequate search and no responsive records were found.
Request for incident reports between 1994 and 1998. MPD’s response was affirmed on the basis that it conducted an adequate search and no longer maintained responsive records.
Request for records related to Democratic National Committee and the Profiling Project. The appeal was based on ODMPSJ failure to response to the request and ODMPSJ did not respond to the appeal. As a result, the request was remanded to ODMPSJ.
Request for records related to government contracts. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because DCHR responded to the request after the appeal was submitted.
Request for records related to complaints against a police officer. MPD’s Glomar denial was affirmed on the basis that disclosure would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
Request for records related to medical marijuana dispensary applications. On appeal DOH reconsider its initial denial and disclosed responsive records with redactions to protect personal privacy. DOH’s redactions were affirmed.
Request for records related to government contracts. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because OCP responded to the request after the appeal was submitted.
Request for records related to government contracts. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because OCP responded to the request after the appeal was submitted.
Request for an individual’s autopsy report. OCME’s denial was affirmed because disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy and violate statutory procedures to release autopsy reports.
Request for any records related to two addresses. DOEE’s decision to disclose responsive records at the conclusion of its review was remanded, and DOEE was instructed to disclose nonexempt records on a rolling basis.
Pages
