Washington, DC
Publications
Request for records submitted by District to Amazon. Matter remanded to DMPED, because the withheld record did not implicate the deliberative process privilege and because the release of the records would not cause commercial harm.
Request for officer involved shooting data. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from MPD and MPD provided requester with a response.
Request for records related to construction activity at an address. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from DCRA and DCRA provided requester with a response.
Request for portions of a bidder certification form. Matter remanded to DGS to disclose some redacted portions, because parts were not protected by the commercial information exemption and because there was no personal privacy interest.
Request for records related to performance evaluations. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from OCP and OCP provided requester with a response.
Request to answer questions. Appeal dismissed, as DOC was not obligated to answer questions, and because requests must reasonably describe a record.
Request for records related to two addresses. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from DCRA and DCRA provided requester with a response.
Request for records relating to Hearst Park. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from DDOT and DDOT provided requester with a response.
Request for record related to a contract. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from DHS and DHS provided requester with a response.
Request for registered agent corporate filing. EOM’s decision affirmed because it conducted an adequate search and EOM did not possess the requested records.
Pages
