Washington, DC

Bookmark and Share

Publications

E.g., 07/15/2025
E.g., 07/15/2025
01/11/2021

Request for records regarding lead testing of water. Appeal dismissed as moot because it was a new request, that DC Water represented it would address.

2018-032
01/11/2021

Request for records of health information relating to lead poisoning. Appeal dismissed, as OCME was not obligated to answer questions, and because requests must reasonably describe a record.

2018-037
01/11/2021

Request for investigatory records of communications between a homicide victim and Wikileaks. MPD’s decision was affirmed, because release of any responsive investigatory records would interfere with an enforcement proceeding.

2018-025
01/11/2021

Request for grant agreement. DMPED’s decision was affirmed because the redacted information involved commercial information, the release of which could cause substantial harm.

2018-030
01/11/2021

Request to answer a question. Appeal dismissed, as EOM was not obligated to answer questions, and because requests must reasonably describe a record.

2018-035
01/11/2021

Request for payment standards information regarding an MLS advertisement. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from DCRA and DCRA provided requester with a response.

2018-040
01/07/2021

Request for records relating to litigation, along with communications to the Mayor’s Office of Legal Counsel. Appeal decided by Office of the Secretary, dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from OCFO and OCFO provided requester with a response.

2018-013
01/07/2021

Request for footage of street camera. Due to its retention policy, MPD no longer possessed responsive records at the time of the request. MPD’s decision was affirmed.

2018-018
01/07/2021

Request for correspondence with the Human Rescue Alliance. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from DOH and DOH provided requester with a response.

2018-005
01/07/2021

Request asking to interpret law. DMV’s decision was affirmed, because DMV was not obligated to conduct research or answer interrogatories.

2018-010

Pages

Subscribe to Publications List