Washington, DC
Publications
Request to answer a question. Appeal dismissed, as EOM was not obligated to answer questions, and because requests must reasonably describe a record.
Request for payment standards information regarding an MLS advertisement. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from DCRA and DCRA provided requester...
Request for emails with a set of search terms. Appeal remanded to DOEE, because the agency had no adequately shown redacted emails were protected by the deliberative process privilege.
Request for application and hiring materials. Appeal was dismissed after MPD provided additional documents; MPD was not obligated to create additional records.
Request to answer a question. Appeal dismissed, as DCHA was not obligated to answer questions, and because requests must reasonably describe a record.
Request for records relating to three investigations. OHR’s decision was affirmed, because OHR provided responsive documents.
Request asking to interpret law. DMV’s decision was affirmed, because DMV was not obligated to conduct research or answer interrogatories.
Request for body worn camera footage, a PD-251 and a PD-61. MPD’s decision was affirmed on the basis that release of the records could interfere with an enforcement proceeding.
Request for contract with Human Rescue Alliance. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from OCP and OCP provided requester with a response.
Request for records relating to MPD training policies. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from MPD and MPD provided requester with a response.
Pages
