Washington, DC
Publications
Request to answer a question. Appeal dismissed, as DCHA was not obligated to answer questions, and because requests must reasonably describe a record.
Request for records relating to three investigations. OHR’s decision was affirmed, because OHR provided responsive documents.
Request for records related to two addresses. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from DCRA and DCRA provided requester with a response.
Request for records relating to Hearst Park. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from DDOT and DDOT provided requester with a response.
Request for record related to a contract. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from DHS and DHS provided requester with a response.
Request for registered agent corporate filing. EOM’s decision affirmed because it conducted an adequate search and EOM did not possess the requested records.
Request for records relating to MPD training policies. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from MPD and MPD provided requester with a response.
Request for records related to an investigation of an officer involved in a shooting that occurred on September 11, 2016. MPD’s decision was affirmed on the basis of personal privacy interests.
Request for two emails related to Hearst Park. DGS’s response was affirmed, because the redacted portions were draft language that would have revealed the deliberative process.
Request for records relating to MPD trips or activities located in foreign countries. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because MPD was in the process of responding.