Washington, DC
Publications
Request for personnel records. Appeal remanded to MPD to complete production.
Request for records concerning a criminal matter related to requester’s client. MPD’s redaction of personally identifiable information was affirmed. A portion of the appeal was remanded to MPD to release professional information and business addresses.
Request for communications between ABRA and a complainant. Appeal remanded in part to ABRA, on the basis that the withheld records weren’t investigatory records and that corporate entities do not have a privacy interest.
Request for records related to body-worn cameras. Appeal remanded to MPD to conclude its search and produce responsive documents.
Request for a 911 call. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from OUC and OUC provided requester with a response.
Request for correspondence between MPD and MOLC. MPD’s decision was affirmed in part and remanded in part, so that MPD could provide requester with a fee estimate.
Request for an unsigned, undated affidavit sent from MPD to EOM. MPD’s decision was affirmed, as no record that matched the request’s description existed.
Request for records relating to residential placements of committed youth. On appeal DYRS produced records that it had previously withheld as protected by the deliberative process, this portion was found to be moot. The remainder of the appeal was remanded to DYRS to conduct an additional search...
Request for correspondence that contained the requester’s name. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from MPD and MPD provided requester with a response.
Request for arrest report records of requester’s clients. Appeal remanded to MPD because it was unclear that release of the records would interfere with an enforcement proceeding.
Pages
