Washington, DC
Publications
Request for records related to a criminal investigation. MPD’s denial was affirmed because disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
Request for records related to a former employee. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because DCRA responded to the request after the appeal was submitted.
Request for records related to a business’s taxes. The appeal was based on OCfO failure to response to the request and OCFO did not respond to the appeal. As a result, the request was remanded to OCFO.
Request for records related to lost or stolen firearms. MPD’s denial was remanded because the records could be disclosed with reasonable redactions to protect personal privacy interests.
Request for records related to a racial discrimination case against UDC. The appeal was based solely on UDC’s FOIA fees related to FOIA Appeal 2017-137. UDC’s fee schedule was affirmed because it provided an estimate that did not include costs for software upgrades.
Request for records related to an employee. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because DCRA responded to the request after the appeal was submitted.
Request for records related to the investigation of an alleged sexual assault. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because MPD responded to the request after the appeal was submitted follow the conclusion of enforcement proceedings.
Request for records related to an address. DCRA’s response was affirmed on the basis that it conducted an adequate search and disclosed all responsive records.
Request for records related to the Hearst Park & Pool Project. In response to the appeal, DGS acknowledged that additional responsive records were located by subsequent searched. DGS’s response was remanded to disclose nonexempt responsive documents on a rolling basis.
Request for records related to a business’s taxes. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because OCFO responded to the request after the appeal was submitted.