Washington, DC
Publications
Appeal dismissed because DCPS fully responded to the request.
NCRC responded to the request by the time the appeal decision was written. Appeal dismissed
Records not in their possession, appeals dismissed.
Request denied because OCFO did not have the documents. Appeal dismissed.
MPD initially did not release document because unwarranted invasion of personal privacy upon review MPD identified responsive documents and reversed denial.
DCRA provided a partial response and failed to follow up with additional information or finding. DCRA ordered to make reasonable effort to produce requested information
Requester appealed because DCRA failed to respond. DCRA has now responded therefore appeal is moot and was dismissed
Requester claimed DHR wrongfully withheld information claiming it was personal. DHR ordered to provide requested documents with 10 business days
Appellant requests more information because they claim the original request was mischaracterized, MPD used an inapplicable exemption and a duty to redact. The appeal was dismissed.
Appellant argues on appeal that WASA’s FOIA response was late, and nonresponsive. WASA ordered to produce a Vaughn Index and responsive materials.
Pages
