Washington, DC
Publications
Requester wanted information relating to himself and claimed OCME failed to respond. OCME claimed not to have any relevant documents because they do not maintain records on living people.
Requester claimed response was insufficient and did not respond to the request. The document was the best available response, if not responsive the document may not exist.
Requester sought documents relevant to a criminal case. MPD identified responsive documents and is making them available. Appeal dismissed
DOC responded to the initial request saying there were no responsive records. Appeal dismissed because the logs do not contain responsive documents.
Appeal dismissed because DCPS fully responded to the request.
NCRC responded to the request by the time the appeal decision was written. Appeal dismissed
Records not in their possession, appeals dismissed.
Request denied because OCFO did not have the documents. Appeal dismissed.
Requester appealed because DCRA failed to respond. DCRA has now responded therefore appeal is moot and was dismissed
MPD initially did not release document because unwarranted invasion of personal privacy upon review MPD identified responsive documents and reversed denial.
Pages
