Washington, DC

Bookmark and Share

Publications

E.g., 06/07/2024
E.g., 06/07/2024
05/04/2016

Summary: Request for report by consulting group that assessed health care services at correctional facilities. DOC’s decision was affirmed in part on the basis of the deliberative process privilege and remanded in part. DOC was ordered to disclose segregable records.

2015-64
05/04/2016

Summary: Request for records related to an armed robbery. The appeal was dismissed as moot because MPD found and agreed to provide responsive documents after the appeal was filed.

2015-69
03/08/2016

Summary: Request for records related to mental health counselor positions. DBH’s decision to make redactions to protect personal privacy was upheld.

2015-51
03/08/2016

Summary: The Executive Office of the Mayor lacks jurisdiction over FOIA requests to federal agencies.

2015-50
03/08/2016

Summary: Request for records pertaining to the investigation and prosecution of a 1994 murder. The investigatory records exemption was not found to be applicable as a blanket exemption, and MPD was order to search, review, and release non-exempt records.

2015-43
03/08/2016

Summary: Request for records related to an individual’s professional engineering license. DCRA claimed that the records it found were not responsive to the specific request. DCRA was order to provide the licensure certification.

2015-48
03/08/2016

Summary: Appeal was filed based on the lack of the agency’s response. OUC responded to the request after the appeal was filed.

2015-56
03/08/2016

Summary: Request for 18 categories of records related to public school students, teachers, tests, reports, and calculations. DCPS’s response was affirmed in part and remanded in part, and DCPS was ordered to disclose records related IMPACT ratings and wealth disparities among students.

2015-40
03/08/2016

Summary: Request for records related to placement of special educations students. DCPS provided additional records and explanations after the appeal was filed.

2015-46
03/08/2016

Summary: Appeal was filed based on the lack of the agency’s response. DYRS responded to the request after the appeal was filed.

2015-53

Pages

Subscribe to Publications List