Washington, DC
Publications
Summary: Request for records related to an assault. MPD’s decision was affirmed based on the investigatory records exemption.
Summary: Request for records related to overtime payments for certain MPD officers. The appeal was dismissed as moot because MPD released responsive documents after the appeal was filed.
Summary: Request for records related to MPD firearm use and citizen complaints against certain officers. MPD’s decision was affirmed in part on the basis of personal privacy. MPD’s decision was remanded in part regarding records related to firearm discharges and incident reports...
Summary: Request for records related to the development of the McMillan Sand Filtration site. DMPED’s decision was affirmed in part based on the deliberative process privilege and the sensitivity of commercial information. DMPED’s decision was remanded in part to disclose redacted...
Summary: Request for records related to parking data. DDOT’s response was upheld on the basis that it conducted an adequate search and no responsive records were found.
Summary: Request for records related to withdrawals, suspensions, and expulsions at schools administered by OSSE. OSSE’s response was affirmed in part regarding the adequacy of its search for responsive records. OSSE’s response was remanded in part to consider if its disclosure could...
Summary: Request for resumes of applicants who applied to UDC’s chief of police. UDC’s decision to withhold resumes of unsuccessful applicants was upheld on the basis of personal privacy.
Summary: Request for records related documented gunshots. MPD’s decision was remanded, and MPD was ordered to allow the requester to pay for the cost of a report from the contractor or to receive the raw gunshot data from MPD.
Summary: Request for information related to an arrest. MPD’s decision to deny the request in part was upheld on the basis of personal privacy.
Summary: Request for records related to the licensing and inspection of a daycare facility. The appeal was dismissed as moot because OSSE provided responsive documents after the appeal was filed.
Pages
