Washington, DC

Bookmark and Share

Publications

E.g., 06/14/2024
E.g., 06/14/2024
03/16/2018

Request for a list of all FOIA denials that were overturned on appeal by the MOLC. MPD’s search was determined to be adequate. MPD’s decision was affirmed, because MPD was not obligated to create new records or answer interrogatories.

 

2017-037
03/16/2018

Request for records relating to Stingray equipment. The appeal was remanded to MPD to conduct a search and perform reasonable redactions.

2017-040
03/16/2018

Request for records related to the LEAP Teacher Professional Development Program. The appeal was remanded to DCPS to conduct an additional search.

2017-038
03/15/2018

Request for individual medical records. On appeal proper authorization was provided to DBH, which provided responsive records, and the appeal was dismissed as moot.

2017-031
03/15/2018

Request for records related to requester. The adequacy of DOC’s search and the redactions it made were affirmed. Appeal was remanded in part because DOC did not specify which investigatory exemption it was invoking.

2017-034
03/15/2018

Request for records related to a specified address. Appeal withdrawn after DCRA provided requester with additional information.

2017-032
03/15/2018

Request for records related to the 2002 theft of a Honda Civic. Appeal was found to be duplicative of FOIA Appeals 2017-21 and 2017-29. MPD’s decision was affirmed.

2017-035
03/15/2018

Request for records related to a restaurant. Appeal was based on a failure to respond, and DDOT provided a receipt that showed DDOT’s response had been received by the requester. The appeal was dismissed as moot.

2017-033
03/14/2018

Request for records related to a proposed rulemaking. Requester was asked to submit his request in FOIAXpress and interpreted it as a denial. Appeal dismissed as moot, because DDOT represented it was providing responsive documents to requester.

2017-026
03/14/2018

Request for records related to the 2002 theft of a Honda Civic. For same reasons as FOIA Appeal 2017-21, MPD’s decision was affirmed on the basis of personal privacy interests in records compiled for law enforcement purposes.

2017-029

Pages

Subscribe to Publications List