Washington, DC
Publications
Request for records related to an autopsy. OCME’s denial was affirmed because disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
Request for records related to rewards made related to the investigation of a 1990 homicide. MPD’s response was affirmed on the basis that it conducted an adequate search and no responsive records were found.
Request for records related to a replacement check. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because OCFO responded to the request after the appeal was submitted.
Request for records related to an address. The appeal was withdrawn because DCRA responded to the request after the appeal was filed.
Request for records related to job requisitions. DCHR’s response was affirmed on the basis that it conducted an adequate search and disclosed records that were most responsive to the request. Also, DCHR’s decision that it did not have to create new records to respond to the request...
Request for records related to a 1968 homicide investigation. MPD’s response was affirmed on the basis that it conducted an adequate search and no longer maintained responsive records.
Request for records related to documents submitted in a discrimination case. OHR’s denial was remanded, and OHR was ordered to disclose copies of documents that were originally submitted by the requester.
Request for an individual’s autopsy report. OCME’s denial was affirmed because disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy and violate statutory procedures to release autopsy reports.
Request for any records related to two addresses. DOEE’s decision to disclose responsive records at the conclusion of its review was remanded, and DOEE was instructed to disclose nonexempt records on a rolling basis.
Request for records related to transportation of homeless people. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because DHS responded to the request after the appeal was submitted.
Pages
