Washington, DC
Publications
Request for emails with a set of search terms. Appeal remanded to DOEE, because the agency had no adequately shown redacted emails were protected by the deliberative process privilege.
Request for application and hiring materials. Appeal was dismissed after MPD provided additional documents; MPD was not obligated to create additional records.
Request to answer a question. Appeal dismissed, as DCHA was not obligated to answer questions, and because requests must reasonably describe a record.
Request for records relating to three investigations. OHR’s decision was affirmed, because OHR provided responsive documents.
Request for records related to two addresses. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from DCRA and DCRA provided requester with a response.
Request for records relating to Hearst Park. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from DDOT and DDOT provided requester with a response.
Request for record related to a contract. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from DHS and DHS provided requester with a response.
Request for registered agent corporate filing. EOM’s decision affirmed because it conducted an adequate search and EOM did not possess the requested records.
Request for memoranda of understanding and agreement. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from DCPS and DCPS provided requester with a response.
Request for records related to contract with website. MPD’s decision was affirmed, because MPD and DMV are separate agencies and MPD was not obligated to transfer requester’s request.
Pages
