Washington, DC
Publications
Request for records related to the investigation of an alleged sexual assault. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because MPD responded to the request after the appeal was submitted follow the conclusion of enforcement proceedings.
Request for records related to an address. DCRA’s response was affirmed on the basis that it conducted an adequate search and disclosed all responsive records.
Request for records related to the Hearst Park & Pool Project. In response to the appeal, DGS acknowledged that additional responsive records were located by subsequent searched. DGS’s response was remanded to disclose nonexempt responsive documents on a rolling basis.
Request for records related to a business’s taxes. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because OCFO responded to the request after the appeal was submitted.
Request for records related to the award of a government contract. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because DPW rerouted the request to DC Water.
Request for records related to eight police reports. MPD’s search was affirmed as adequate. The appeal did not appear to challenge MPD’s application of FOIA exemptions.
Request for records related to a line item summary of a contract. DGS’s response was affirmed on the basis that it conducted an adequate search for responsive records and was not obligated to created new records in response to a FOIA request.
Request for records related to a personnel file and employment incident. DCRA’s denial was affirmed in part, because it was not required to create records in response to the request. DCRA’s denial was remanded in part, because responsive records could be disclosed with reasonable...
Appeal based solely on redactions DOC made following the remand of FOIA Appeal 2017-86. DOC’s redactions were affirmed in part for information protected by the deliberative process privilege. DOC’s redactions were remanded in part because the redacted information did not involve a...
Request for all records between two agencies related to the requester. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because DOES provided additional records after the appeal was filed.
Pages
