Washington, DC
Publications
Request to answer a question. Appeal dismissed, as DCRA was not obligated to answer questions, and because requests must reasonably describe a record.
Request for registered agent corporate filing. Appeal was dismissed as prematurely filed.
Request for evaluations and analysis pertaining to an address. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from DCRA and DCRA provided requester with a response.
Request for records relating to Hearst Park. The appeal was dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from DGS and DGS provided requester with a response.
Request for records regarding lead testing of water. Appeal dismissed as moot because it was a new request, that DC Water represented it would address.
Request for records of health information relating to lead poisoning. Appeal dismissed, as OCME was not obligated to answer questions, and because requests must reasonably describe a record.
Request for records related to a previous complaint made to ORM. ORM’s decision was affirmed, because ORM was not obligated to answer interrogatories.
Request for all applications and permits of an address. Appeal of redaction to contractor’s personal email address. DCRA’s decision was affirmed on the basis of personal privacy interests.
Request for records relating to litigation, along with communications to the Mayor’s Office of Legal Counsel. Appeal decided by Office of the Secretary, dismissed as moot, because the appeal was based on a lack of response from OCFO and OCFO provided requester with a response.
Request for footage of street camera. Due to its retention policy, MPD no longer possessed responsive records at the time of the request. MPD’s decision was affirmed.
Pages
